Here you’ll find:
For a more concrete approach, we closely monitor the situation in real-time as a self-check of our macro view. We track the evolution of the American economy by monitoring capital rotation between sectors. These trends help us describe the current state of the economy and serve to double-check our hypotheses (more here). Check the last column that shows the sensitivity of each sector to a slowdown or recession. With 1 being the highest sensitivity. After this check, we move on to Intermarket analysis, looking for setups.
As a guide, the path to a recession typically sees capital rotating towards more resilient or defensive sectors, such as Utilities, Health Care, and Consumer Staples. Along the way, the more “elastic” sectors will be impacted to a greater extent, eventually exhibiting negative growth.
Like a domino, each piece is falling into place. The path to a recession is nearly perfect. We even have two sectors already showing negative growth, and we know what that implies for employment. Our hypothesis remains intact, so we will continue trading based on it.
Dot.com Crisis: “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” Mark Twain.
*Today is 27-9, and the chart uses a monthly scale, which is why the latest rate cut by the F.E.D. isn’t reflected yet.
The important thing to note is that the spread between F.E.D funds rate and the 2-year rate at the start of the Dot.com crisis and today are the same. I emphasize, literally the same.
Opportunities are emerging at the short end of the curve. Before moving on to the practical part of the report, I want to share an economic model I came across while researching for this report. It provides empirical evidence on the formation of interest rates.
Conclusion: Productivity boosts real interest rates during the expansion phase, but the resulting financial crisis leads to a sharp decline in those rates.
Does this remind you of anything?
Intermarket Basis here
With the beginning of rate cuts, one cycle ends, and a new one starts, introducing new market dynamics.
The Money Market is currently at the center, filled with dollars at historic highs. While this report is quarterly, the latest update was on September 12, 2024. Historically, every time this situation has occurred, it has signaled uncertainty in the markets. Take note of the relative peaks reached during the Dot.com and GFC crises.
We know that U.S. equities are in a process of rotation towards more resilient sectors. We also know that, as a whole, they are expensive in historical terms.
Faster and larger short-term rate cuts compared to long-term rates imply:
We start the analysis from July 2022, the point when the U.S. yield curve inverted using the synthetic World Currency Unit (W.C.U.) as the common denominator. It is a basket of currencies weighted by the relative size of each economy.
The chart is on different scales, so it’s not useful for analyzing comparative levels. However, it helps observe the evolution of each currency post-inversion. The euro shows a clearly positive growth rate. In the case of the dollar, the inversion had virtually no effect. Its decline started much earlier and has been continuous. Are we witnessing portfolio diversification at the currency level? It makes sense.
Nothing here. The Mexican Peso and the Australian Dollar don’t seem to have reacted or altered their trajectory in response to the inversion.
The Indian Rupee continues its decline, which had already started before the inversion, while the Brazilian Real seems completely unaffected.
Historically known as “safe havens,” both begin to rise the moment the yield curve inverts. As we’ve noted, since the charts are on different scales, we can’t analyze comparative levels or relative growth between them, for now.
Both experience an initial drop followed by a recovery. The yen’s movement is partly due to the unwinding episode, while the Yuan is harder to analyze, as it’s heavily intervened by the Chinese Central Bank.
The Euro and Swiss Franc are the fiat currencies that have responded to the curve inversion. Both are considered diversifying currencies and have historically served as safe havens. Gold, a commodity closely associated with safe-haven status, has the unique characteristic of not generating income, which leads to a high opportunity cost.
There is no carry trade between the fiats. We are witnessing a currency rotation toward “safe havens,” but this rotation is more pronounced towards gold, despite its nearly 5% opportunity cost since July ’23. This is a fully defensive market, as we mentioned here on July 15, 2024 that accepts the opportunity cost in exchange for greater security.
You can find the setup that generated this research here.
As always, I hope you enjoyed this as much as I did writing it. That’s all for now.
Trades and setups derived from this analysis can be found in Article #22 and are exclusive to subscribers.
Please share this.
The subscription won´t cost you anything and it makes our day. You can find us at intermarketflow.com and on X @intermarketflow.
See you soon,
Martin.