What you will find here:
The 10-year real rate is the market’s benchmark rate. There are several reasons for this, but the key distinction—when compared to the 2-year rate—is its independence from the rates set by the Federal Reserve. This independence makes the information conveyed by the 10-year real rate much “purer,” as it provides a clearer reflection of what the market expects for the future.
The 10-Year Real Rate and Its Effects on the Real Economy.
The 10-year real rate impacts the real economy through various channels and
activities:
We’ve already seen, here,that nominal rates—the ones publicly published—carry several implicit messages within their structure. Understanding these messages is key to deciphering what the market expects for the next 10 years.
This insight is especially critical for operations, particularly long swing strategies or for holders.
Real Rate=10-Year Nominal Rate -10-Year Inflation Expectations – 10-Year Term Premium.
On September 24, just over a month ago, a new macroeconomic narrative entered the market: nominal rates
began to rise. This period is particularly significant because it was referenced by Jerome Powell during his press conference and, importantly, it
directly impacts our trading style.
As we analyze this shift, it’s crucial to understand the implications of rising nominal rates and how
they align with real rates. This connection offers valuable insights into market expectations and helps refine our strategies in response to evolving economic conditions.
The 10-year real rate has risen by 8.19%. The real issue, however, is that the risk component has surged by 161.54%. Jerome Powell referred to this rate increase—albeit ambiguously—suggesting that the market sees future growth.
However, what the market has been signaling since September is risk. As a result, it demands higher compensation to account for that uncertainty.
Since September, something has changed: real rates have remained relatively stable while nominal rates have been rising due to a higher term premium.
This is the chart to watch—not only because it reflects current levels but also because it perfectly illustrates what’s happening.
The peak level reached during the Global Financial Crisis (G.F.C.) is the same level we touched in October 2023. This serves as a reference point in a historical context.
Gold has managed to hold its ground and even rise despite the 10-year real rate increasing. However, the breakthrough from the consolidation zone begins precisely when the 10-year real rates start to decline. This is not a coincidence—it’s causality.
In October 2023, a new macro narrative quietly entered the market.
It should not go unnoticed that a safe-haven asset with a high opportunity cost is at historic highs. This Is a clear reflection of the overall state of the market.
Typically, one would expect that lower interest rates would be expansive for the stock market—and they are. However, since September 24, nominal rates have risen by 15%. This should be corrective for equities, not only because of the rate
increase itself but also because the reason behind the rise signals the market perceives greater risk. This is the central point.
The effect is broad and not exclusive to the S&P 500.
According to the Realtors Association, single-family home prices simply keep rising.
The correlation is grounded in the fact that AAA bonds cannot offer a lower rate than the country’s sovereign debt, simply because they are issued within the same country. The spread between the two provides significant insights into the risk the market perceives the corporate bond market.
In fact, spreads between government debt and corporate debt are excellent proxies for assessing the current state and expected evolution of the economy.
There is also a message in the value of this price. Low prices indicate lower future demand. Here, we see that this expectation remains valid at least until March 2025.
The same situation repeats itself. Same message. We already observed this here.
The effect of the 10-year real rate on all economic assets is remarkable. In one way or another, it impacts everything. Nothing in the real economy operates in isolation of the 10-year real rate. We return to the foundational diagram of Inter Market analysis.
In Article #1, we covered the fundamentals of Inter Market analysis. If you haven’t had the chance to read it yet, I suggest you do so here. It clarifies essential concepts.
A decline in 10-year real rates can have both positive and negative consequences, depending on the macroeconomic context, the phase of the economic cycle and the reasons behind the decline in rates.
Within the macro and global context we have been developing across several articles (macro,global, stage of the cycle), a decline in rates can have the following effects on the real economy:
Many of these effects, if not all, are reflected in today’s economy. Furthermore, many assets show the same reading as our hypothesis, such as gold, energy, and the rise in more defensive equity sectors.
We can be defensive, and we can also defend aggressively. These are two completely different approaches. Position size, leverage, and time horizon vary from one scenario to another.
Regardless of the choice, the operational strategy is clear. We proceed in search of the vehicles.
The market has already priced in higher risk on 10-year bonds. However, it doesn’t seem to have done the same with some other assets.
We are looking for:
If we seek aggressiveness:
As always, this choice determines the size and horizon of the trade.
Defensive Sectors
There’s not much mystery here. The novelty lies in the fact that it seems gold is absorbing flows that previously had other destinations, such as the yen and the Swiss franc. This shift highlights a change in investor behavior, where gold is increasingly viewed as the preferred safe-haven asset. As a result, it’s drawing in capital that might have otherwise gone to traditional safe-haven currencies.
Aggressive defense: Combined operation.
As you all know, we believe this chart is unsustainable. There are several reasons for this:
Trading the S&P 500 means you’re trading the best—the top companies, the most solid ones. It’s not an asset where you go looking for a peak. It’s an asset that should only be traded with technical confirmation, and not directly, but through another vehicle.
In other words, aggressive defense only kicks in under specific circumstances that must be met prior to the trade. This is a very important difference compared to the previous style.
Very aggressive setup in the following blog article. Look for it there!
As always, I must remind you that these are not recommendations. These are our analyses and, in some cases, our trades that we have decided to make public for marketing purposes.
You can find us at intermarketflow.comor on X @intermarketflow.
We’ll stay in touch.
Martin