Introduction
We relate currency analysis to equities in Western developed countries. In this
case, we’ll look at real interest rates of the major global economies to infer strengths and weaknesses for each one.
The macro identity we reviewed here establish:
Nominal Rates = Real Rates + Inflation Expectations + Term Premium
By playing with this identity, we can infer that:
Real Rates + Term Premium = Nominal Rates – Inflation Expectations.
Of course, this will give us a snapshot of today’s real rates. This photo is part of a never-ending movie that’s in constant change and doesn’t capture the rate of change in the underlying variables. In other words, it has a lot of technical limitations. Despite this, we can still use it to infer useful information. A valid analogy would be comparing it to an annual report for a company.
We contrast this information against the currency and main stock index of each country, all under the lens of our primary U.S. macro view, discussed several times. We add to this macro view our conclusion from the previous article, which can be summarized in the following chart:
These are the commodity future prices the market expects for commodities in March 2025, as we reviewed here. In that article, we broke down futures for Energy, Industrial Metals, and Grains. They all convey the same message: the world is currently expecting an economic slowdown by March 2025, which is reflected through prices.
It’s also true that the future price of precious metals adds a postscript to this message: there is uncertainty and risk aversion. The level of uncertainty of this aversion can be mesured by the opportunity cost of gold.
We can infer this to be today in this way.
That’s the real opportunity cost of gold today: 2.13%.
Before continuing, some methodological notes:
1. We calculate the monthly real interest rate using each country’s current Central Bank lending rates minus each country’s monthly inflation expectations.
2. We assume that the term premium is constant across all countries. This is, of course, an unrealistic assumption. Unfortunately, to analyze and compare the evolution of a specific variable, it’s necessary to establish ceteris paribus across countries. Otherwise, comparison becomes impossible. (Term Premium = the extra return required for investing in a 10-year bond instead of investing 10 times in a 1-year bond.)
3. We use each country’s inflation expectations, in monthly format where available. For those countries that don’t publish this information, we use the most recent monthly CPI data to calculate real rates.
Let’s begin.
These charts, without surrounding context, would suggest a healthy economy. We’ve already seen that when you dig deeper, this isn’t the case. Despite this, the currency responds to the real rate, and the S&P Equal Weight is skyrocketing.
Alright, let’s read this chart:
This market shows extreme weakness. Few buyers are entering, and they’re dwindling, yet sellers haven’t appeared. The stage is set for a stampede. However, trying to catch the peak is risky—there could be plenty of “stupid” investors, and the stampede might take time. Furthermore, the S&P 500, in particular, attracts funds from around the world, making it more resilient than other indices. Of course, there are also the “Magnificent 7” stocks that distort the entire index.
The Euro responds to the rise in real rates, but to a much lesser extent than the Dollar, for example. This is already a warning sign regarding real growth expectations in the Euro zone.
The situation is very similar, though not as extreme. One key difference is that these are the 50 largest companies in Europe, which don’t include the “Magnificent 7,” unlike the 500 in the U.S. S&P, which do include them. If we expanded the sample, the situation would change.
It’s a very similar situation to the S&P 500 and EU50. Prices are rising without volume
support, moving outside the value zone and even reaching the upper part of the channel.
This is another fragile scenario.
The pound responds to positive interest rates but not in the same proportion, which is a warning sign.
The index begins to rise even before the real interest rates increase. Let’s dig into the market details.
Same story. Lack of volume. Unsustainable.
These two variables lack connection. The Yuan/USD volatility shows no relation to China’s real interest rates. This is a clear sign of distrust in the currency and, therefore, in real growth expectations for China.
This market is much more in touch with reality. Volume is present, and the index, which was trending downward, reacts strongly to the recent economic measures announced.
Intermarket analysis, once again, shows us the bigger picture. It’s no longer just about going short or long on a stock, a market, a bond, or a commodity. A global perspective lets you understand what’s happening and opens up options to choose a vehicle you might not have considered.
Whenever I can, I enjoy watching Animal Planet. It always amazes me to see a pride of lions hunting deer, zebras, buffaloes, giraffes, and even elephants. This perfect killing machine is constantly seeking the vehicle that will allow it to eat.
Despite their superior strength, they systematically seek weakness in their prey. From the largest to the smallest, the pride instinctively selects the weakest prey, whether due to illness, age, or size. Nature is wise and markets instinctively act in the same way.
Based on our macro view and inferences from the commodities market, we have been and are still looking for vehicles that allow us to trade a slowdown, not just in the U.S. but globally. We must carefully choose one or several targets.
The full setup can be found in article #26, here in this same blog.
As always, I hope you enjoyed this as much as I did writing it
That’s all for now. Please share this. The subscription won’t cost you anything and it makes our day. You can find us at intermarketflow.com and on X @intermarketflow.
Stay in touch,
Martin